MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 01:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 112
50% 81 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 12.2
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 9
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foxline F56X5SE 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 383 382 414 373 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 418
Write 26.1
Mixed 232
SusWrite 387
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 33
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 185
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 187 192 191 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 187
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 190
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback