TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI A88XM-P33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A88XM-P33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 22:27
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 102
41% 69 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 199
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 45.6%
 Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 70.6
0% 46.5 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 56.5
51% 63 fps
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 17.4%
 Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 66 88 71 56 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 56.6
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 60.3
33% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 32.1%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 32.3%
 Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A88XM-P33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A88XM-P33 V2 (MS-7721)

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD  $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples3x
A8-6600K APUAMD  $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples1x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples1x
GPU
R9 380AMD  $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples1x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples1x
SSD
XPG SX930 240GBAdata  $80Bench 87%, 1,536 samples1x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston  $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples1x
MX300 275GBCrucial  $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples1x
RAM
DDR3 1866 2x8GBAdataBench 43%, 703 samples1x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,904 samples1x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback