MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 18:46
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 173
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 248
37% 268 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 54.2
48% 55.5 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 41.2
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 398 453 446 388 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 310
Mixed 343
SusWrite 425
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 36
134% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 178
172% 272 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
232GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 470 473 480 474 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 448
Mixed 394
SusWrite 471
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 48.1
166% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 255
216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
127GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 1001 964 907 789 742 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 1,888
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 942
355% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 71.2
239% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 747
562% 755 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 244%
Great: 297%
Lexar JD Secure II + 16GB
15GB free, PID a732
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $852
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback