Asus ROG G703GX_G703GX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive586% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG G703GX_G703GX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G703GX
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 630
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1701) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 49 51 48 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
586% Outstanding
Read 6,626
Write 54.7
Mixed 108
SusWrite 48
355% 1,709 MB/s
4K Read 788
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 6.2
1,204% 266 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 586%
Great: 293%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
462GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 290 160 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 403
Mixed 409
SusWrite 217
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 44.5
140% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 310
236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
612GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2221 2237 2239 2246 2241 2254 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,383
SusWrite 2,240
437% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 63.4
215% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 914
686% 921 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 321%
Great: 425%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
354GB free
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 412 434 454 496 493 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,311
Mixed 1,263
SusWrite 448
256% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 95.9
321% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 419
451% 761 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 231%
Great: 293%
SDXC Card 249GB
231GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 21 26 44 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 87.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 31.1
89% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 8
512% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-2G6B2 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 27.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG G703GX_G703GX Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Asus ROG G703GX_G703GX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback