Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory123.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 146
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 544
47% 400 Pts
64-Core 1272
79% 1272 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 74.3
59% 76.2 fps
MRender 77.7
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 64.6
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 257 261 263 120 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 440
Write 235
Mixed 315
SusWrite 194
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 19.8
84% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 36.7
69% 135 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K1R8CR-MIB 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 47.3
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback