Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 736
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1568 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 117
Parallax 104
81% 107 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 100
Splatting 92.6
80% 98.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 437 444 421 413 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 426
Mixed 429
SusWrite 425
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 49.9
159% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 257
199% 272 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
680GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 171 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 156
Mixed 114
SusWrite 170
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 33
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback