Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 07:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 114
50% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spccsoli dStateDisk 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 31 99 29 95 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 149
Write 62.9
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 62.1
17% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 3
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50.4
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 18.3
18% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
223GB free
Firmware: GT00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 43 46 45 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 31.9
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 44.2
23% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
226GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 59.1
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 58.4
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
200% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD160B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 15.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback