Apple MacBookPro11,5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro11,5  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-06F11F11946D27C5
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 01:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 506
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M370X
Apple(106B 0149) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 6.7
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 2.9
3% 4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512G PCIe 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,099
Write 809
Mixed 742
196% 883 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 22.6
72% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 491
351% 458 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 223%
APPLE SD Card Reader 250GB
109GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 48 50 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 76.8
Write 45.7
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 46.4
62% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 5
321% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343147533642465238412D50422020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 20.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,5 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback