bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 20:29
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 52
2-Core 76.5
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 61
8-Core 77.5
9% 69.2 Pts
64-Core 81.1
5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 56GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 88 49 56 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 181
Write 155
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 91
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 64 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.9
18% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback