Lenovo 81DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81DE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 92.2
55% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 518
41% 362 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 3964) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 8.6
6% 8.67 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-1T 1TB
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0530B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 387 408 370 329 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 459
Write 318
Mixed 324
SusWrite 369
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 31.1
129% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 51.2
87% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81DE Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback