Lenovo 81SX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81SX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 12:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 667
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.5% Good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 80.7
71% 87.7 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 73
67% 83.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L3A0B 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80050C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 759
Write 900
Mixed 791
183% 816 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 63.6
214% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 333
343% 567 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 172%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
274GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 206 189 36 129 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 396
Write 303
Mixed 252
SusWrite 152
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 10.5
50% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 29.8
42% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 27
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81SX Builds (Compare 5,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81SX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback