Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 21:30
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 706
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 99.7
81% 99.7 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 221
Splatting 101
158% 208 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 106%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1780 1483 1147 1272 1452 1439 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 2,250
Mixed 1,831
SusWrite 1,429
450% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 71.3
225% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 653
475% 622 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 286%
Great: 410%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$27
191GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 229 134 96 77 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 191
Write 235
Mixed 221
SusWrite 144
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 17.3
90% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 28.6
61% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
997GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 116 115 115 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 121
Write 84.7
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 114
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
778GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 94.2
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
462GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 69
SusWrite 125
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 37.7
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback