HP ENVY 17 Leap Motion SE NB PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY 17 Leap Motion SE NB PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1968
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '17 at 22:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 198
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 478
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
HP(103C 219D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 10.5
8% 10.2 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 13.1
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 496
Write 252
Mixed 314
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 16.5
79% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 7.3
65% 151 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
177GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 119
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.21
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 17 Leap Motion SE NB PC Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 17 Leap Motion SE NB PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback