Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 00:48
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 130
51% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 353
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 35.6
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 26.7
26% 33 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
601GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 298 248 244 247 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 444
Write 412
Mixed 307
SusWrite 262
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 24
81% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 212
164% 224 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 106%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 195 193 189 183 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 137
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 191
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91%
Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 194 201 210 194 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 181
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 202
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 186 183 187 183 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 186
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 185
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.8
361% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%
WD Game Drive 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 120 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 119
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.8
287% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 66%
WD Game Drive 4TB
381GB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 37.4
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback