HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory18 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 06:46
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 84
2-Core 168
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 661
59% 497 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 53.2
47% 56.3 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 47.4
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
234GB free
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 577 304 306 305 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 1,061
Mixed 952
SusWrite 431
206% 922 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 271
176% 199 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 120%
Great: 235%
HP EF0600FARNA 600GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 38 50 61 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 181
Write 72.3
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 39.4
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 109%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
682GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 120 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 119
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 174 173 178 179 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 151
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 174
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR4C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR4C-H9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback