HP ProDesk 490 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 490 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18EB
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 297
36% 278 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 4.7 4.4 44 113 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 440
Write 47.8
Mixed 76
SusWrite 36.1
32% 150 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 32.9
79% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 54.2
50% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
128GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 103 106 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 96.7
Mixed 58
SusWrite 96.6
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 490 G1 MT Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 490 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback