Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 129 59% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 253 33% 250 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 68%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sata SSD 512GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 443GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 151 143 141 144 177 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 87.6 Write 119 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 159 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 8 36% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 12.8 DQ Write 25.9 DQ Mixed 13.1 12% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG 4x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 00AD000080AD HMT351U7BFR8A-H9 00AD000080AD HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 00AD000080AD HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 12GBUnknownBench 40%, 8 samples	6x
HMT112R7BFR8C-G7 6x1GBHynixBench 31%, 6 samples	3x
HMT125R7BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 25 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16