Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U748

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U748  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2B4
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 68.6
34% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 179
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-00007 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7507Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 578 633 581 331 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,008
Write 908
Mixed 645
SusWrite 468
169% 757 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 26.6
91% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 238
171% 216 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 106%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U748 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U748

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback