Supermicro H8QG7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro H8QG7  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8QG7
Memory125 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 09:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6376
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 106
50% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 333
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMC SMC2208 179GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.22
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,586
Write 1,738
Mixed 1,608
368% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 72.9
246% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 299
227% 304 MB/s
ELECOM MF-KNU2 8GB
3GB free, PID 6028
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 6.2 6.1 6.7 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.94% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 5.8
6% 5.48 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965433-154.A00LF 16x8GB
16 of 32 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback