HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory20.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 167
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 666
59% 501 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.8% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 53.1
47% 56.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 47.2
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 197 199 198 198 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 257
Write 245
Mixed 243
SusWrite 198
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 32.1
106% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 142
111% 149 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
234GB free
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 373 306 306 306 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,130
Mixed 987
SusWrite 447
215% 959 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 43.8
141% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 465
337% 438 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 141%
Great: 235%
Hitachi UltraStar 15K600 450GB-$136
42GB free
Firmware: HPH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 152 160 175 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 180
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 162
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.5
292% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 108%
Hitachi UltraStar 15K600 450GB-$136
227GB free
Firmware: HPH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 160 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 162
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.5
290% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 108%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
684GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 124
71% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 175 172 179 177 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 120
Write 135
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 172
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
693GB free, PID 107c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 94.8
Write 91.7
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 102
113% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR4C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351R7BFR4C-H9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback