Performance Results


Gaming 178% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 174% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '21 at 00:49
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 84 1-Core 138 2-Core 277 91% 166 Pts	4-Core 553 8-Core 1,111 98% 832 Pts	64-Core 1,102 68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	194% Outstanding	Lighting 279 Reflection 263 Parallax 325 227% 289 fps	MRender 331 Gravity 243 Splatting 178 197% 251 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 60GB free Firmware: STKSF010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 102 94 49 109 76 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52% Above average	Read 284 Write 147 Mixed 171 SusWrite 78.9 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 12 93% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 103 106% 175 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 757GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1745 1551 1328 500 573 522 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2,474 Write 2,229 Mixed 1759 SusWrite 1,036 420% 1,875 MB/s	4K Read 63.5 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 86.3 292% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,519 DQ Write 1,256 DQ Mixed 1,376 1,034% 1,384 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 435%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 921GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 180 182 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 208 Write 179 Mixed 106 SusWrite 180 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB 12,209 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 27.4 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 24.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	844x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	484x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	432x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $432

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16