HP 110-335nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 110-335nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B05
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 20:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 60.7
26% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 99.3
8-Core 84
13% 91.7 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2B05) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
0% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 47 57 79 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 76.3
Write 65.4
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 63.1
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback