Asus H110M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-F (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 19:39
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 115 2-Core 232 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 449 55% 423 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	45.6% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 59 Parallax 77.2 47% 64.5 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 60.8 Splatting 42.8 43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BR 120GB 120GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 712XSJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 138 139 139 139 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 353 Write 105 Mixed 135 SusWrite 137 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 10 102% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 56 62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 75%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 10GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 400 Write 179 Mixed 294 64% 291 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 25.9 132% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 136 134% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 138GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 103 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 113 63% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3A1 1x8GB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 12 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 13 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-F

CPU
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	41x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	39x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	35x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
256GB SSD 256GBXraydiskBench 85%, 422 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400C16K2 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 108 samples	9x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GBTeamBench 41%, 3,973 samples	7x
MLVD48192MLD-24 1x8GBUnknownBench 39%, 15 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16