HP 550-144nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 550-144nf (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B2C
Memory	2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151110
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 18:55
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 153 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 460 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 2B2C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.31% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 6.6 3% 5.33 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.31% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 131 123 148 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 151 Write 154 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 128 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 107%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 1TB 1,327 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 0GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 55.1 Write 54.3 Mixed 22.1 32% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 519GB free, PID b208 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 91 91 91 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 140 Write 101 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 93 110% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425U6AFR6A-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 6GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550-144nf Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 550-144nf

CPU
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	2x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16