To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 84.9 43% 66 Pts	4-Core 73 8-Core 61.4 9% 67.2 Pts	64-Core 53 3% 53 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 2A42) 1.2GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.2 0% 0.37 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lantic 128GB 128GB 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0226A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 40 20 37 37 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	Read 241 Write 216 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 57.3 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 14.1 59% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 1.8 19% 41.5 MB/s

Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 462GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 120 112 116 125 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 129 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 120 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata M378B5673FH0-CH9 6GB 0, 0 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16