MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,162
107% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,310
143% 2,310 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 188
Parallax 176
138% 178 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 177
Splatting 124
117% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 111 111 118 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 463
Write 118
Mixed 119
SusWrite 114
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 21.3
118% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 50.2
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$160
1TB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 487 486 484 484 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 481
Mixed 390
SusWrite 484
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50.2
180% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 277
229% 330 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 121%
Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 487 489 488 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 484
Mixed 423
SusWrite 488
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 62.9
211% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
95GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 43 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 52
Write 54.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 42.2
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 39.6
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback