Acer Nitro AN515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Stonic_RNS
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 20:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 243
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 754
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 1447) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 50.4
45% 53.4 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 42.5
41% 51 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1014 256GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,420
Write 904
Mixed 923
239% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 54.7
187% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 575
465% 654 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 184%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$82
579GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 360 378 380 370 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 392
Mixed 358
SusWrite 367
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 39.1
125% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 224
172% 232 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 8.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-44 Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback