Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 140
56% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 328
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 158
Parallax 136
127% 150 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 144
Splatting 113
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 500
Write 467
Mixed 464
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 19.3
124% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 19.7
42% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 152
Write 115
Mixed 120
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.24
84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 147
Mixed 139
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.28
112% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 77.6
Write 75.9
Mixed 74
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.27
106% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
417GB free
Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 100
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
14GB free, PID 1408
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 86
Write 9.39
Mixed 24
37% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.69
4K Write 0.46
72% 4.58 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback