bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory146GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 146GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory141.3 GB free of 146.484 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6230
None, 1 CPU, 30 cores, 60 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 759
70% 586 Pts
64-Core 3,413
211% 3,413 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtual de Microsoft 537GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 287 271 293 298 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 362
Write 302
Mixed 332
SusWrite 259
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 6.8
26% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 94.4
102% 179 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 67GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 75.4
MC Mixed 52.3
170% 59.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 139%
Great: 412%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback