Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory	18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 11:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 162 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 419 42% 341 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gainward(10B0 1B81) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.9% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 109 Parallax 98.7 83% 103 fps	MRender 92.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 98.6 80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 51 54 83 221 234 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.2% Above average	Read 283 Write 104 Mixed 133 SusWrite 119 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 22.1 85% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 61.7 79% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 89%
Liteon IT LCS-256L9S 256GB 909 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 93GB free Firmware: HC82202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 356 383 401 382 405 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 452 Write 380 Mixed 284 SusWrite 353 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 30.4 108% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 169 155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 24GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	4x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GBLexarBench 61%, 2,181 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples	1x
M500 240GBCrucial $73Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC72B89B0NF-CG 14GBHynixBench 50%, 3 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	2x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16