Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 08:08
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 169 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 371 43% 333 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 21E3) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 14.1 Parallax 13.9 12% 14.4 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 10 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 201 Write 196 Mixed 189 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 37.8 122% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 46 37% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 269GB free Firmware: SD1A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,689 Write 19.4 Mixed 61.9 900% 1,257 MB/s	4K Read 431 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 4.3 18,476% 146 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 389GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 169 Write 158 Mixed 81.7 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB 1,993 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 146GB free Firmware: 0104 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 32.6 Write 29.2 Mixed 26.1 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 35%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60M2NA0 1TB 403GB free, PID 2351 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 3,706 Write 10.9 Mixed 22.1 831% 1,246 MB/s	4K Read 380 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 1,486% 127 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.8 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-UD2H Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	53x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	53x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	46x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $27Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	78x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	70x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16