Toshiba Satellite L855

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L855  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 129
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 187
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB22) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.4
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bory R500 120G 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 217 93 46 47 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 357
Write 320
Mixed 267
SusWrite 119
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 13.6
82% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 16.8
27% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
450GB free
Firmware: 0006SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.7
Write 71.9
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 75.2
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6EFR8C-PB Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 17.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L855 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback