Asus A8N-SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A8N-SLI  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20051125
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 15:53
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 21.5
28% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 26.5
8-Core 26.1
4% 26.3 Pts
64-Core 26.6
2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.9
Write 73.9
Mixed 37.9
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: SC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.8
Write 80.1
Mixed 46.9
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 61%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 10.9
Mixed 10.3
8% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 58%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
757GB free
Firmware: GKAOA70M
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 0.3
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A8N-SLI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback