Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 11:49
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 123
54% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 240
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 209
Parallax 258
129% 208 fps
MRender 293
Gravity 217
Splatting 156
174% 222 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 135%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 146 132 119 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 432
Write 387
Mixed 350
SusWrite 157
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 39.4
125% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 257
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108
6GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 399
Mixed 356
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 33.1
111% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 151
130% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
22GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 79.5
Write 67.1
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 81.1
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
46GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42% Average
Read 87.6
Write 88.7
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 58.4
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
387GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 63.6
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 58.4
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
264GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 25.4
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 25.6
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback