PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120418 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 11:49 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
135%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 146 132 119 113 112 MB/s
|
77.4%
Very good
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
22GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 82 81 82 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
46GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
|
42%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
387GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
264GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |