Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 317
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 937
96% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Rx6800 XT
Dell(1028 3950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.45.01.15
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 211
Reflection 240
Parallax 399
172% 283 fps
Gravity 152
Splatting 259
190% 206 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 172%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 23000020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2089 2160 1504 472 462 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 2,383
Mixed 1493
SusWrite 1,194
430% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.1
227% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,118
805% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 292%
Great: 321%
Amd-raid SATA SSD 1TB
556GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 396 404 349 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 80
Write 284
Mixed 249
SusWrite 286
52% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 20.3
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 85
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 102
108% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 66%
Pcie SSD 2TB
360GB free
Firmware: ECFM52.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 1243 1243 1262 876 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 1,337
Mixed 1,110
SusWrite 1018
255% 1,128 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 77.7
273% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 1,294
DQ Mixed 1346
983% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 243%
Great: 556%
Amd-raid ST2000DM008-2FR1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 212 218 190 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 178
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 124%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
313GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 38
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
WD Game Drive 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 114 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 113
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.9
233% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 120
Write 105
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 100
132% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.6
310% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
368% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X2YH1K-MIE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 30.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback