Lenovo 4352A8G

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4352A8G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131018
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 205 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 610 59% 487 Pts	64-Core 759 47% 759 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 21.6 17% 20 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 22 Splatting 15.9 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 486GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 235 234 234 233 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	77.8% Very good	Read 246 Write 234 Mixed 229 SusWrite 236 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 45.5 148% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 162 121% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 557GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 451 449 447 448 448 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 433 Mixed 379 SusWrite 449 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 43 146% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 116%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 500GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 201GB free, PID b001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 19.9 Mixed 15 SusWrite 23.9 28% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9 Kingston 99U5584-005.A 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4352A8G Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 117%

UFO

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Lenovo 4352A8G

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2680 v2IntelBench 71%, 1,619 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	3x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples	5x
00LF231 LENOVO 240GBMz7lm240hcgr-000v3Bench 65%, 3 samples	1x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
PSD38G16002 2x8GBPatriotBench 52%, 6,044 samples	3x
RMR1881ED58E9 Kingston 99U5584-005.A 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
9965516-477.A 1x16GBKingstonBench 36%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16