Intel X79M-S

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 66 2-Core 131 56% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 383 39% 318 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.7% Average	Lighting 63.7 Reflection 69.4 Parallax 79.5 52% 70.9 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 56.7 Splatting 42.8 42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 50%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1006 128GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 215 216 218 218 218 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 917 Write 746 Mixed 714 SusWrite 231 146% 652 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 38.5 135% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 425 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 392 283% 369 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 155%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170GB0- 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.6% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16.3 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16