Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DA
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '21 at 00:17
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 60.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 201 66% 122 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 416 48% 373 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 8.3 4% 7.7 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 7.4 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB 15,006 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 212 200 203 195 196 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,443 Write 911 Mixed 924 SusWrite 239 195% 879 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 61.6 205% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 679 DQ Write 434 DQ Mixed 543 408% 552 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 199%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 811GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 121 124 124 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 103 Write 100 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 121 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 CB8GS2666.C8ET 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 20.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 23.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_M509DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	190x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	80x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	33x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	190x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	80x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	33x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	118x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	27x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	25x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	79x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	74x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16