Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 23:32
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 582
54% 453 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 1367) 2GB
CLim: 1379 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 37
Parallax 44.1
27% 38.2 fps
MRender 47.8
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 36.7
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFD 1TB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 420 425 424 413 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 316
Write 455
Mixed 368
SusWrite 431
89% 392 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 31.9
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 339
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback