Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 31.2 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 49.1 23% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 57.1 8-Core 68.7 8% 62.9 Pts	64-Core 66.5 4% 66.5 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.3% Good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 81.6 Parallax 75.8 75% 83.1 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 80.4 Splatting 72 58% 71 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 392 409 398 449 457 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 428 Write 376 Mixed 396 SusWrite 394 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 31.2 107% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 228 174% 235 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 367GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 147 140 153 149 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 17.6 Write 152 Mixed 34 SusWrite 144 63% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB 5,762 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	69x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	65x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	81x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16