Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 19.7 1-Core 60.2 2-Core 96.5 31% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 98.7 13% 99.8 Pts	64-Core 95.4 6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8346) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.37% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 9.4 1% 5.67 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 7 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.37% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 252 310 320 319 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 431 Write 411 Mixed 291 SusWrite 297 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 36.6 123% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 189 143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0x9E02 CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 16GB 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 323 12% 323 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	55x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	26x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	17x

SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	4x

RAM
HP24D4S7S8MB-4 1x4GBKingstonBench 31%, 777 samples	12x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16