Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11DSi-NT
Memory24.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 07:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7301 16-Core
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 166
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 589
55% 459 Pts
64-Core 3,580
222% 3,580 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 48.9
40% 50.6 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 55.9
42% 51 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 318
Mixed 26
59% 270 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 1.2
39% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 42.2
54% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback