Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V5.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V5.2
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 440
51% 397 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Clevo(1558 0150) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 7.4
4% 12.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
488GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 86 83 89 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 95
Write 97
Mixed 31
SusWrite 84.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7]218 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V5.2 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback