Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 61 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 62.2 40% 59.9 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 143 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M 9,073 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 2142) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 512GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 18 17 137 154 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.8% Poor	Read 147 Write 11.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 59.8 13% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 10.4 37% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 16.5 12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.6% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 4.1 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM