HP 510-p117c

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 55%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 510-p117c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 143
56% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 227
32% 233 Pts
64-Core 246
16% 246 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 292A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.93
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.27 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
6% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 369 408 381 416 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 388
Write 416
Mixed 313
SusWrite 373
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 33.8
116% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 254
212% 304 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 510-p117c Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 510-p117c

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback