Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 258
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 758
79% 634 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 93.1
Parallax 85.8
77% 91.1 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 74.4
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 365 357 357 289 240 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 529
Mixed 802
SusWrite 343
152% 685 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 48.3
161% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 229
198% 307 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 129%
Great: 152%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 17.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.1
11% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 6%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 32GB
25GB free, PID 0153
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 32.2
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 34.5
42% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.2
218% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 Adata AM2P26KC4R1-BXTS Adata AM2P26KC4R1-BXTS 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback