MSI MS-6788

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMSI MS-6788  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
FC-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 31.7
14% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 31.8
8-Core 32.3
4% 32 Pts
64-Core 32.6
2% 32.6 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3402111A 40GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 21 26 31 40 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 13
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 29.6
11% 15 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 28%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 64GB
43GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7 7.3 8 8.9 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 14
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.8
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
32% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback