Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 13:59
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core 4,397 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 66.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 266 83% 156 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 903 85% 705 Pts	64-Core 1,846 114% 1,846 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFME1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 49 35 65 67 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.5% Below average	Read 219 Write 106 Mixed 106 SusWrite 63.2 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 9.4 54% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37.3 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 93.4 58% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 95%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 161 152 153 143 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 85 Write 125 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 153 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 88%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 2TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 488GB free, PID 012e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 26 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 22.2 Mixed 17 SusWrite 27.6 32% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB 847 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 29.3 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 22.4 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	877x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $178Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	839x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,005

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16