Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '17 at 01:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 367
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 92.9
62% 80.3 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 59.5
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 427
Mixed 469
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.3
150% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 73.8
113% 213 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
247GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 76.5
53% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback