Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory6.7 GB free of 11 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5405
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 48.1
30% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 92.1
8-Core 86.7
12% 89.4 Pts
64-Core 92.1
6% 92.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570
Nvidia(10DE 0474) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.00
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.9
0% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 292GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 149 144 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 581
Write 50.6
Mixed 426
SusWrite 140
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 39.6
143% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 142
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 25 24 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.73% Terrible
Read 32
Write 25.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 25.4
6% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.6
22% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 11GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback